Romans in Near east: Orientation of Roman towns and forts in modern Jordan

An essential difference between the western and eastern provinces of the Roman Empire is the fact that

sophisticated urban cultures had developed in Asia Minor and the Levant centuries before the Romans

arrived. Underlying the Hellenized, and later Roman, veneer was a myriad of older local traditions and

languages, which had an immense impact upon Roman religious tradition through elements such as the

introduction of new religious practices. Following the path of previous studies, in this article we try to

discern how Roman culture was inherited and adapted to the heterogeneous Eastern traditions and how it

could be reflected in the architecture and urban layout, mainly in what concerns to the orientation of the

urban structures. Considering ancient writings, such as those of Higynius Gromaticus (Constitutio, I), the

orientation of these features could follow the position of certain celestial bodies, mainly the sun, which

would imply a careful observation of the sky. Developing the lines of previous studies on the orientation of

Roman settlements in the western part of the Empire (González-García et al., 2014 & Rodríguez-Antón et al.,

2016), a number of Roman cities and military settlements in modern-day Jordan, Syria and Palestine are

analysed here. Through this approach, we try to obtain a first insight into whether their orientations looked

towards astronomical positions and wether there existed common patterns comparing with those sites

previously measured in Hispania or Britannia. This would help us to obtain a wider vision of Roman ritual

practices, cosmovisions and how Roman culture could have evolved, spread and became assimilated

through lands and time.

Orientation of Roman settlements. Roman urbanism. Ancient Jordan. Eastern Roman Empire. Limes Arabicus. Decapolis.